The Biomimetic Uprising Membership Online Courses Biomimetic Business Coaching Publications

Scientific Articles

These articles build off one another.  These are the foundation of what is biomimetic dentistry. 

 
JOIN THE CLUB

What the articles cover...

Benefits of Biomimetic Dentistry

The Adhesive Equation

Structural Integrity vs Structural Compromise

Hierarchy of Bondability

Crack Propagation

Risk Assessment for Fracture and Decay

Immediate Dentin Sealing

Resin Coating

Gold Standard Dentin Bonding

Peripheral Seal Zone

Carries Removal Endpoints

Indirect vs Semi-direct vs Direct 

 

Decoupling with Time

Fiber-net Placements

Onlaying Cups

Materials

Biomimetic Treatments of Endo Teeth

 

 

 

 

The Accreditation 25

  1. Unterbrink G, Liebenberg W. Flowable resin composites as “filled adhesives”: literature
    review and clinical recommendations. Quintessence International 1999;30:249-257.
  2. Urabe I, Nakajima M, Sano H, Tagami J. Physical properties of the dentin-enamel junction
    region. American Journal of Dentistry 2000;13:129-135.
  3. Fusayama T. Clinical guide for removing caries using a caries-detecting solution.
    Quintessence International 1988;19(6):397-401.
  4. Pashley D, Tay F, Yiu C, Hashimoto M, Breschi L, Carvalho R, Ito S. Collagen
    degradation by host-derived enzymes during aging. Journal of Dental Research
    2004;83(3):216-221.
  5. Brannstrom M. The hydrodynamic theory of pain: sensation in preparations, caries, and the
    dentinal crack syndrome. Journal of Endodontics 1986;12(10):453-457.
  6. Larson T, Douglas W, Geistfeld R. Effect of prepared cavities on the strength of teeth.
    Operative Dentistry 1981;6:2-5.
  7. Milicich G, Rainey J. Clinical presentations of stress distribution in teeth and the significance in operative dentistry. Practical Periodontics & Aesthetic Dentistry
    2000;12(7):695-700.
  8. Versluis A, Tantbirojn D, Pintado M, DeLong R, Douglas W. Residual shrinkage stress
    distributions in molars after composite restoration. Dental Materials 2004;20:554-564.
  9. Iida K, Inokoshi S, Kurosaki N. Interfacial gaps following ceramic inlay cementation vs
    direct composites. Operative Dentistry 2003;28(4):445-452.
  10. Krejci I, Stavridakis M. New perspectives on dentin adhesion-differing methods of
    bonding. Practical Periodontics and Aesthetic Dentistry 2000;12(8):727-732.
  11. Dietschi D, Monasevic M, Krejci I, Davidson C. Marginal and internal adaptation of class II restorations after immediate or delayed composite placement. Journal of Dentistry
    2002;30:259-269.
  12. Magne P, Kim T, Casione D, Donovan T. Immediate dentin sealing improves bond strength
    on indirect restorations. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 2005;94(6):511-519.
  13. Jayasooriya P, Pereira P, Nikaido T, Tagami J. Efficacy of a resin coating on bond
    strengths of resin cement to dentin. Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry 15(2):105-
    113.
  14. Belli S, Donmez N, Eskitascioglu G. The effect of c-factor and flowable resin or fiber use at the interface on Microtensile bond strength to dentin. Journal of Adhesive Dentistry
    2006;8(4);247-253.
  15. Feilzer A, de Gee A, Davidson C. Setting stress in composite resin in relation to configuration of the restoration. Journal of Dental Research 1987;66(11):1636-1639.
  16. Versluis A, Tantbirojn D, Douglas W. Do dental composites always shrink toward the light? Journal of Dental Research 1998;77(6):1435-1445.
  17. Wilson N, Cowan A, Unterbrink G, Wilson M, Crisp R. A clinical evaluation of class II composites placed using a decoupling technique. Journal of Adhesive Dentistry
    2000;2(4);319-329.
  18. Nikolaenko S, Lohbauer U, Roggendorf M, Petschelt A, Dasch W, Frankenberger R.
    Influence of c-factor and layering technique on Microtensile bond strength to dentin. Dental
    Materials 2004;20:579-585.
  19. Uno S, Tanaka T, Natsuizaka A, Abo T. Effect of slow-curing on cavity wall adaptation using a new intensity-changeable light source. Dental Materials 2003;19:147-152.
  20. Opdam N, Roeters J, Kuijs R, Bergersdijk R. Necessity of bevels for box only class II composite restorations. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 1998;80:274-279.
  21. Fennis W, Kuijs R, Kreulen C, Verdonschot N, Creugers N. Fatigue resistance of teeth restored with cuspal-coverage composite restorations. International Journal of
    Prosthodontics 2004;17:313-317.
  22. Asmussen E, Peutzfeldt A. The effect of secondary curing of resin composite on the adherence of resin cement. Journal of Adhesive Dentistry 2000;2(4):315-318.
  23. Gibbs C, Mahan P, Mauderli A, Lundeen H, Walsh E. Limits of human bite strength.
    Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 1986;56(2):226-229.
  24. Fennis W, Tezvergil A, Kuijs R, Lassila L, Kreulen C, Creugers N, Vallittu P. In vitro
    fracture resistance of fiber reinforced cusp-replacing composite restorations. Dental
    Materials 2005;21:565-572.
  25. Magne P, Belser U. Rationalization of shape and related stress distribution in posterior teeth---a finite element study using nonlinear contact analysis. Journal of Periodontics and Restorative
    Dentistry 2002;22:425-433.
Close

50% Complete

Two Step

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.